Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College District

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 2008No. S153964PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

When an employee voluntarily pursues an internal administrative remedy prior to filing a complaint under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) (FEHA), is the statute of limitations on her FEHA claim subject to equitable tolling? We conclude it is. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeal, which reversed a defense summary judgment entered solely on the ground that plaintiff Sylvia Brown’s FEHA claim was untimely.

Factual and Procedural Background

Plaintiffs John McDonald, Sylvia Brown, and Sallie Stryker filed suit against defendant…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dr. Julia Elizabeth Berry v. The Board of Supervisors of L.S.U., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Addison v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. Zina Butler v. Housing Auth. County of LaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API