Legal Opinion

Futrell v. Payday California, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 2010No. B215110PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIGELOW, P. J.

This appeal arises from a class action alleging violations of sections of the Labor Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.) (FLSA) by a payroll processing company operating in the local television commercial production industry. Plaintiffs’ primary claim is that the payroll company violated various Labor Code and FLSA wage statutes, including Labor Code sections 510 and 1194 (authorizing a private right of action),1 by failing to pay statutorily required overtime compensation rates to plaintiffs. In the context of a motion for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Aleksick v. 7-Eleven, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Mendoza v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Haralson v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API