State v. Tacker
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property and appeals.
His sole contention of error is based upon the trial court’s failure to sustain his motion to suppress the property he was alleged to have received and concealed.
His contention that the motion to suppress was erroneously overruled is grounded on the contention that the affidavit upon which a search warrant was issued and the property seized was insufficient in that it is based upon information and belief.
The affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued is as follows:
“STATE OP OREGON,)) ss.
Cou…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. CartwrightOregon Supreme Court · 1966
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.