Legal Opinion

Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 9, 2000No. 98-201 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Judge.

The Plaintiff, Exxon Research and Engineering Co., alleges that the United States infringed two patents, United States Patent Nos. 5,348,982 and 5,292,705. Both patents concern the process for converting natural gas to premium quality hydrocarbons. More specifically, the ’705 patent concerns how to increase the efficiency of a catalyst used in a Fischer-Tropsch reaction.1 The ’982 patent concerns how to operate a slurry bubble column reactor most efficiently. The United States, through a motion for summary judgment, has challenged the validity of these patents because…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Newbridge Networks Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
  2. Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Scimed Life SystemsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  4. System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. SDS USA, INC. v. Ken Specialties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API