Legal Opinion
System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2001No. 97 CIV 8101 RWSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ■
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants and counterclaim-plaintiffs Avesta Technologies, Inc. (“Avesta”) and David Zager (“Zager”) (collectively, “Avesta”) have moved for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, against plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant System Management Arts Incorporated, and counterclaim-defendants Shaula Yemini and Yechiam Yem-ini (collectively, “Smarts”), declaring as invalid certain of the claims of the patent-in-suit in this patent infringement action. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
The Parties
The parties are…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Newbridge Networks Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001
- Dow Chemical Co. v. NOVA CHEMICALS CORP.(CANADA)District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Digene Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004