Legal Opinion
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. v. Scimed Life Systems
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 25, 2000No. C 6-00946 CWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ACS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S JUNE 22, 1999 ORDER
WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (ACS) moves for partial reconsideration of the Court’s June 22, 1999 Order denying ACS’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the inequitable conduct and indefiniteness defenses raised by Defendant SciMed Life Systems (SciMed). SciMed opposes the motion. Having considered all if the papers filed by the parties, the Court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
This case involved a patent infringement suit brought by ACS against SciMed in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- VLT CORP. v. Unitrode Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- System Management Arts Inc. v. Avesta Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Corning Inc. v. Sru BiosystemsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2006