Legal Opinion

Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 11, 2002No. 97-21CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALLEGRA, Judge.

Chemical Separation Technology, Inc. (CST) and Sanford M. Stevenson seek compensation from the government, under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a), for unlawful use of two of their patents. The patents at issue are U.S. Patent No. 5,370,800 (the 800 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 4,749,497 (the 497 patent), both of which relate to the treatment of waste water and are used in a device marketed by CST. In this opinion, the second in this case, the court supplies the rationale for its prior ruling construing the patents and addresses defendant’s various assertions that the patents are…

2Cases cited139 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. TDM America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. TDM America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. TDM America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API