Legal Opinion

Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Newbridge Networks Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 21, 2001No. 97-347-JJFPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in this patent infringement action is a Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law 1 (D.I. 616) filed by Plaintiff, Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”) and a Renewed Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law At The Close Of The Evidence (D.I.618) and a Motion For A New Trial On Certain Issues (D.I.617) filed by Defendants, Newbridge Networks Corporation and Newbridge Networks, Inc. (collectively “Newbridge”). 2 By its Motion For Judgment As A Matter Of Law, Lucent requests the Court to enter a judgment of infringement against Newbridge on…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006
  2. Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Atlas Copco ABDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  3. Genzyme Corp. v. ATRIUM MEDICAL CORP.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004
  4. Green Mountain Glass LLC v. Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  5. Inline Connection Corp. v. Earthlink, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API