Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1999No. 99-1572PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board, but we determine that disbarment is the appropriate sanction in this case. In Part I, we demonstrate that our decision to disbar respondent in this case comports with sanctions we have imposed in previous cases involving comparable ethical violations. In Part II, we support our determination with the methodology employed in the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, which closely track guidelines for sanctions that were recently proposed for adoption by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court.

I

Althou…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GallagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. WestmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ClowerOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. OsborneOhio Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. BeelerOhio Supreme Court · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API