Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Glatki

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 99-2270PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

In disciplinary proceedings, the complaint must allege the specific misconduct that violates the Disciplinary Rules, and the relator must prove such misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Reid (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 327, 331, 708 N.E.2d 193, 197; Gov.Bar R. V(6)(J). Applying this standard here., we adopt the findings and conclusions of the board insofar as it concluded that respondent’s conduct regarding her five clients violated DR 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), and 7-101(A)(2). We further find that although the board did not so conclude, relator charged and proved by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Warren County Bar Ass'n v. BunceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SimecekOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KomarekOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. GoldenOhio Supreme Court · 2002

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API