Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board, but we determine that disbarment is the only appropriate sanction.
I
Although we decide disciplinary matters on a case-by-case basis, other similar disciplinary proceedings are helpful in determining sanctions. Disbarment is not uncommon where DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1 — 102(A)(6) violations stem from felony convictions. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 539, 687 N.E.2d 682 (respondent disbarred after pleading guilty to the felonies of theft and receiving stolen property); Disciplinary Counsel v. Ostheimer (1995), 72 Ohio…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re Complaint Against Judge HarperOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ConnaughtonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. ChurillaOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MoselyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Ohio State Bar Assn. v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. McAuliffeOhio Supreme Court · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.