Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Westmeyer
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We adopt the findings of fact and recommendations of the board. Additionally, we find that the panel did not err in refusing to admit the results of the polygraph examinations. Relator did not agree to their admission as required by Souel, supra. See, also, State v. Jamison (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 182, 190, 552 *40N.E. 2d 180, 188. Moreover, we neither ordered the evidence admitted nor have we overruled Souel. We also reject respondent’s contention that the panel and board inappropriately considered respondent’s prior misconduct reported at Toledo Bar Assn. v. Westmeyer (1988), 35 Ohio St. 3d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Toledo Bar Ass'n v. WestmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by7 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Counsel v. MazerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. ArmengauOhio Supreme Court · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.