Legal Opinion

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Osborne

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1991No. 91-855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s findings, but decline to follow its recommendation as to the penalty. We find a six-month suspension insufficient. As the panel noted, this is the second time Osborne has violated the Code of Professional Responsibility. In view of his past conduct, which involved conflicts of interest, a six-month suspension is too light a penalty for this repeat offender. See Gov.Bar R. V(8). Moreover, Osborne compounded his offense by claiming that he misunderstood the restraining order. His argument that the order’s language somehow excluded the residence was indefensible; his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. RohrerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cincinnati Bar Association v. HauckOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. AkeOhio Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API