Bruce v. Bruce
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff for a divorce from the defendant.
The parties intermarried in the month of March, 1896, the defendant having previously been married and raised a family of children by his former wife.
An interlocutory decree, adjudging plaintiff to be entitled to a divorce, was rendered and entered.
The decree, however, assigned to the defendant the homestead of the parties and awarded to the plaintiff, as alimony for her permanent support and maintenance, the lump sum of $4,500, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum., from the date of the rendering of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Krasky v. WollpertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Ames v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Stewart v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Dee v. DeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.