Krasky v. Wollpert
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This appeal is from the judgment and from certain orders afterwards made in regard thereto.
■ The action was brought to recover upon a promissory note for seven hundred dollars, dated November 1,1897, due upon demand, with interest from date at the rate of one per cent per month, made by “ H. G. Krasky,” to plaintiff. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendants are, and were at the time of the execution of the note, copartners under the firm name of V H. G. Krasky,” and that as copartners they made and delivered said note to the plaintiff.
■ The answer of defendant Wollpert…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Warren v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Price v. Occidental Life Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.