Legal Opinion

Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1892No. 14599PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The complaint in this action alleges, in substance, among other matters, that the Esperanza Company, a foreign corporation doing business in Arizona, became in February, 1884, indebted to plaintiff upon two promissory notes, one for the sum of one thousand dollars payable on demand, and the other for the sum of five thousand dollars payable February 12, 1885; that thereafter the said Esperanza Company became indebted to its various stockholders, and a pretended assignment was made of all its property to its “ acting managing officer and agent,” one Blaisdell, for the alleged purpose of paying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Anderson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Fox v. . MoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Coffey v. Norwood & NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. San Francisco Protestant Orphan Asylum Society v. FitzsimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Allan v. Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API