Legal Opinion

Grand Union Hotel v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 2, 1924No. Civ. No. 4851PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This matter comes before us upon a writ to review a supplemental order of the respondent Industrial Accident Commission awarding to respondent Gustaf Lindemann $227.62, to cover hospital and medical expenses incurred by him as a result of an injury which he received in the course of his employment by the petitioner, Grand Union Hotel Company. The petitioner, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, is the insurance carrier.

The respondent Lindemann was injured upon November 10, 1922. The employer disclaimed liability under the facts of the case and refused medical and surgical treatment to Lindemann.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Metropolis Trust & Savings Bank v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. National Engineering Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. People's Savings Bank v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Barry v. Peterson Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hindes v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API