Legal Opinion
Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1918No. L. A. No. 4847. L. A. No. 4929PublishedCited by 20 opinions
APPLICATION for Writs of Review against Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George H. Moore, and Redman & Alexander, for Petitioners. Christopher M. Bradley, and Daniel W. Burbank, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
The facts of these two applications, so far as they are necessary to a decision of the questions presented thereby, are fully and correctly set forth in the former opinion filed herein, and are as follows:
“Two proceedings in certiorari were brought to review successive awards made by the Industrial Accident Commission.
“The application for compensation was made by Laura Sims, claiming to be the dependent sister of Lewis Hicks, who died in consequence of injuries received by him in December, 1915. The commission found that at the time of his injury Hicks was in the employ…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. WhiteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.