Legal Opinion

Metropolis Trust & Savings Bank v. Barnet

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1913No. S.F. No. 6043PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment and from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County granting a permanent injunction. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action -was brought by plaintiff to permanently enjoin defendants from selling certain real estate in Alameda County, 'under a judgment obtained in a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment went for plaintiff and defendants appeal. The only point involved is whether the findings sustain the judgment., The material facts as found are, that on December 4, 1902, H. Brand and wife made six deeds of trust to the California Title Insurance and Trust Company, conveying six lots of land to secure advances of upward of thirty thousand dollars made to them by the respondent, then known as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cent. Lumber & Mill Co. v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People's Savings Bank v. HodgdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hines v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L & T DEVELOPERSMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Kettelle v. KettelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API