Hindes v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Certiorari by which petitioners seek to have set aside and annulled an award of the Industrial Accident Commission, upon the ground that the Commission in entering the same acted without and in excess of its powers and that the findings and award are unreasonable; that the evidence does not sustain the findings of fact and that such findings do not support the award.
It is admitted that petitioners’ statement of the facts are in all material essentials correct. It appears therefrom, in substance, that by an application dated July 10, 1922, the respondent Emil Nasta applied for a hearing before…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Grand Union Hotel v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- McBride v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Benton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Barry v. Peterson Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Hustead v. H. E. Brown Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.