People's Savings Bank v. Hodgdon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sacramento, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
Action to quiet title. It is conceded on both sides that one Gass was the owner in fee of the property in controversy on the 29th day of June, 1855. Being such owner he, on the 17th day of December, 1858, mortgaged the property to Morse and English, trustees, etc. April 21, 1863, a complaint was filed for the foreclosure of the mortgage, and the .proceedings were regularly conducted to judgment, under which the property was duly sold by the sheriff on the 6th of July, 1863, to Morse and English, who received a certificate of purchase, which, in the year 1869, they assigned to Laidley, Hickox,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Thompson v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Valentine v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Metropolis Trust & Savings Bank v. BarnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Rose v. ConlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People Ex rel Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.