Legal Opinion
Mytych v. May Department Stores Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 23, 2002No. SC 16541PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that the formula used by the defendant, May Department Stores Company, for calculating a salesperson’s commission does not violate the prohibition of General Statutes §§ 31-T1e1 and 31-73 (b)2 against an employer deducting any money from its employees’ wages. The plaintiff salespersons claim that the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment because the court incorrectly interpreted the statutes as purely remedial in nature. According to the plaintiffs, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Butler ex rel. Skidmore v. Hartford Technical Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hudgins v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Gomes v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Shortt v. New Milford Police DepartmentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Geysen v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Amoco Oil Co. v. Liberty Auto & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.