Legal Opinion
Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 30, 2008No. SC 17967PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
In this case, which comes to us upon our acceptance of a certified question of law from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (District Court) pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199b (d), 1 we consider whether the forfeiture provisions of three different capital accumulation plans (plans) that the named defendant, Citigroup, Inc., and its defendant subsidiaries, 2 have offered to their employees both through voluntary payroll deductions (payroll plan) and for the payment of bonuses (bonus plan), violate Connecticut’s wage statutes, General…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Truelove v. Northeast Capital & Advisory, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.