Gomes v. Commercial Union Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the defendants owed a duty to the plaintiffs to refrain from preventing a third person from rendering aid to prevent damage to the plaintiffs’ property. The plaintiffs, Joseph Gomes, Marguerite Gomes, Vic’s Automotive Service, Inc., and Victor Mathieu brought an action in five counts against the defendants, Arnold Chase, Lawrence Perl, Michael Perl, Roger Freedman and West Hartford Motel Associates (hotel defendants), and Commercial Union Insurance Company (Commercial Union). The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Clohessy v. BachelorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- LePage v. HorneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Ryan Transportation, Inc. v. M & G AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Baptiste v. Better Val-U Supermarket, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Neuhaus v. DeCholnokySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Mytych v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.