Legal Opinion
Gottlaub v. Cohen
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 4, 1947No. Docket 147/452PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants move to strike the bill of complaint because it states no equitable cause of action. Complainants agreed to buy, and defendants to sell, certain real estate for $21,000. The agreement contains this provision:
"This contract is made subject to the parties of the second part obtaining a mortgage of $18,000 in the form of a G.I. loan * * *. In the event the aforesaid mortgage in the sum of $18,000 is not secured by the parties of the second part or a commitment obtained for the same by September 3, 1946, then this agreement shall be null and void, and the deposit herein paid shall…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Fiedler, Inc. v. Coast Finance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Bateman v. RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- McVoy v. BaumannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Rittenhouse v. SwiecickiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- McCormick v. StephanyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wesley N. Taylor Co. v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Pease v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Reinink v. Van LoozenoordMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Mangus v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.