Legal Opinion
Bateman v. Riley
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 21, 1906PublishedCited by 19 opinions
On bill, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Lea ming, V. 0.
The bill is filed by complainants as vendees to procure a decree of specific performance of a contract made by defendant for the conveyance of land.
*317The written contract is as follows:
“Reed of Luther Batem one hundred $ on payment of a thousand $ for all the beach front and marsh land that I own at or near Fortescue Island and I agree to turn over all leases that I hold to him.
“Dated Jan. 13th, 1000. Wa. W. Riley.
“deed given on the 15th int. Wm. W. Riley.”
It is urged on behalf of defendant that a decree of specific performance cannot be made in this cause because complainants…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Matlack v. ArendNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Carlsen v. CarlsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Siesel v. MandevilleNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Wollenburg v. RynarNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.