Legal Opinion

Pease v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1960No. Civ. 24457PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment for specific performance of a contract of sale of land.

Under the contract dated September 14, 1957, the defendants agreed to sell a lot to the plaintiffs for $5,750 in cash. The agreement contained the following handwritten language : “This sale is contingent on construction loan of approximately $11,000 obtained by buyer. Also that 3 homes may be built and contingent on sale of property Escrow # to close November 10, 1957. ” A printed provision was: “Time is of the essence of this agreement.”

An escrow was opened on September 16, 1957. While it was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wiggins v. ShewmakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API