Reinink v. Van Loozenoord
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
This is a suit for specific performance of a written agreement for the sale of land. From decree denying such relief and dismissing the bill of complaint, plaintiff appeals.
Plaintiff is purchaser under his claimed contract with the owners, defendants Yan Loozenoord. Defendants Poterack and Klukowski, now defendants Poterack by reason of their marriage since commencement of this suit, claim to be purchasers under another agreement which all defendants say was made between them. Pursuant to the latter agreement, the Van Loozenoords have conveyed the propr erty, by deed, to the Poteracks.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Langley v. NorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Columbus Pipe & Equipment Co. v. SefanskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Nyder v. ChamplinIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- Frank v. CoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Reo Motor Car Co. v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Stachnik v. WinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Am-Cal Investment Co. v. Sharlyn Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Godwin v. LindbertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Durant v. STATE, DEPT. OF EDUC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.