Legal Opinion

McVoy v. Baumann

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 18, 1922PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, Y. C.

This is a bill Cor specific performance of a contract for the sale of lands located in this state between Karl Baumann, the owner, as vendor, and Herbert C. McVoy. as vendee. The covenant was to convey to vendee, his heirs or assigns. Between the making of the contract and the date for consummation it was arranged (apparently verbally) among all tire parties concerned that the deed should be made to the vendee’s wife, the present complainant. On the date for consummation specified in the contract, the vendor attended, with a deed duly executed and acknowledged by himself and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Venetsky v. West Essex Bldg. Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  4. Englander v. JacobyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Buttinghausen v. RappeportNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API