Legal Opinion
Karlin v. Conard
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1993No. 92CA2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge METZGER.
Plaintiff, Ervin J. Karlin, appeals from the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of his tort actions against defendants, American Golf Corporation (employer) and Ron Conard (co-employee). In this action premised on injuries sustained by plaintiff in a golf tournament sponsored by the employer, the district court determined that plaintiffs claims were barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act, § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Yol. 3B and 1993 Cum.Supp.) (Act). We agree and affirm the judgment of dismissal.
The pertinent facts are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Popovich v. IrlandoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Rauschenberger v. RadetskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rodriquez v. Nurseries, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dover Elevator Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Middlemist v. BDO Seidman, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bowland v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- Farina v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Villa at Greeley, Inc. v. HopperColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.