Popovich v. Irlando
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
The question in this case is whether the co-employee immunity rule of workers’ compensation law bars a tort claim filed in the county court by an employee seeking damages from a co-employee for the intentional infliction of emotional distress due to sexual harassment. The county court ruled that the exclusive-remedy provisions of the Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act barred the plaintiff’s claim and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. 1 The district court affirmed the judgment of dismissal, and we granted the plaintiff’s petition for certiorari. We conclude that the county court erred in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Byouk v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- PDM Molding, Inc. v. StanbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.