Legal Opinion

Popovich v. Irlando

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1991No. 90SC259PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

The question in this case is whether the co-employee immunity rule of workers’ compensation law bars a tort claim filed in the county court by an employee seeking damages from a co-employee for the intentional infliction of emotional distress due to sexual harassment. The county court ruled that the exclusive-remedy provisions of the Colorado Workers’ Compensation Act barred the plaintiff’s claim and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. 1 The district court affirmed the judgment of dismissal, and we granted the plaintiff’s petition for certiorari. We conclude that the county court erred in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. Grover v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. Byouk v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. PDM Molding, Inc. v. StanbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Mountain City Meat Co. v. OquedaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API