Legal Opinion

Rodriquez v. Nurseries, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1991No. 90CA0620PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

In this appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Nurseries, Inc., and against plaintiffs, Javier and Mary Rodriquez, the question presented is whether the High Voltage Power Lines- Safety Requirements Act, § 9-2.5-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B) (the Safety Act), creates an exception to the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation Act of Colorado, § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.). We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Plaintiff Javier Rodriquez was employed by defendant as a nursery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Popovich v. IrlandoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Alexander v. Morrison-Knudsen CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nevada Power Co. v. HaggertyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. VelozColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Thermo Development, Inc. v. Central Masonry Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Middlemist v. BDO Seidman, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API