Rodriquez v. Nurseries, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant, Nurseries, Inc., and against plaintiffs, Javier and Mary Rodriquez, the question presented is whether the High Voltage Power Lines- Safety Requirements Act, § 9-2.5-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B) (the Safety Act), creates an exception to the exclusivity of the Workers’ Compensation Act of Colorado, § 8-40-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.). We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. Plaintiff Javier Rodriquez was employed by defendant as a nursery…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Popovich v. IrlandoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Triad Painting Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Alexander v. Morrison-Knudsen CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- City & County of Denver v. RinkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Nevada Power Co. v. HaggertyNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. KeefeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. VelozColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Thermo Development, Inc. v. Central Masonry Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Middlemist v. BDO Seidman, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.