Legal Opinion
Villa at Greeley, Inc. v. Hopper
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 11, 1996No. 95CA1655PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
Marvin Hopper, intervenor, appeals from a judgment of the trial court concerning interpretation of a vested property right of plaintiff, The Villa at Greeley, Inc. (developer), in a site specific development plan (PUD plan) approved by defendant, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County (board). We reverse and remand.
In December 1993, the board approved a PUD plan submitted by developer for construction of a pre-parole facility in Weld County. In January 1995, intervenor and others submitted petitions to the county calling for a referendum to give the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. D.K.B.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jordan-Arapahoe, LLP v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Harding Academy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Dolores County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Johnson v. Colorado State Board of AgricultureColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.