Legal Opinion

Beverly Way Associates v. Barham

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1990No. B044557PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

This case presents a single principal issue for resolution, It is whether, in a contract for the sale of real estate, the buyer’s communicated rejection of a “satisfaction” condition precedent to its obligation to purchase terminates the contract so that the buyer cannot later waive the condition and enforce the agreement. We conclude that it does. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court, which reached the same conclusion in its order sustaining a demurrer to the buyer’s suit to enforce the contract.

Factual and Procedural Summary

This case reaches us on the basis…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Bellah v. GreensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lopez v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. In Re Marriage of HassoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. C.J.L. Construction, Inc. v. Universal PlumbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Moore v. CHRONESDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Guzman v. Visalia Community BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API