Legal Opinion

Bellah v. Greenson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1978No. Civ. 39770PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROUSE, J. —

Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. For reasons set forth herein, including an explanation contained in footnote 1, we amend that order and affirm the judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiffs, Melanie and Robert Bellah, are the heirs of Thomasin (Tammy) Bellah, their daughter, who succumbed to a self-inflicted overdose of pills on April 12, 1973. Tammy had been under the care of defendant, Daniel Greenson, a psychiatrist in Berkeley, for an unspecified period of time prior to her death. It appears that, during that time, defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jaffe v. Cranford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API