Bellah v. Greenson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J. —
Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. For reasons set forth herein, including an explanation contained in footnote 1, we amend that order and affirm the judgment of dismissal.
Plaintiffs, Melanie and Robert Bellah, are the heirs of Thomasin (Tammy) Bellah, their daughter, who succumbed to a self-inflicted overdose of pills on April 12, 1973. Tammy had been under the care of defendant, Daniel Greenson, a psychiatrist in Berkeley, for an unspecified period of time prior to her death. It appears that, during that time, defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Lee v. CorregedoreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Jaffe v. Cranford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.