C.J.L. Construction, Inc. v. Universal Plumbing
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER P. J.—
I. Introduction
This case presents the question whether a third party defendant which, pursuant to Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57, 72 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641], seeks to reduce any judgment against it by the amount of workers’ compensation benefits paid to an injured employee, may compel the employer’s participation as a cross-defendant in the employee’s lawsuit. The right to a Witt v. Jackson offset arises when the employee’s injuries were caused by the concurrent negligence of the employer or its agent and the third party. (Ibid.) Given the facts alleged in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Privette v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jordan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- San Mateo Union High School District v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Thaler v. Household Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- American Meat Institute v. LeemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Collins v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.