Legal Opinion

Waldo v. Gould

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1925No. 24,855PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Defendant is the game and fish commissioner of the state of Minnesota, and as such is charged with the duty of enforcing the laws relating to wild animals. Plaintiff, a licensed fur-buyer, shipped two lots of raw or undressed skins of fur-bearing animals from Browns Valley, Minnesota, to Becker Brothers at Chicago, Illinois, in January, 1924. They were seized by game wardens in the city of St. Paul while in the possession of the American Express Company. The skins, or the greater part of them, were thereafter returned to the carrier and forwarded to Becker Brothers. Plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  3. State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Cohen v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Board of Education v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Turnbow v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Bohman v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API