Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Gould
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 10, 1929No. 27,019PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 225 N.W. 435. Replevin for 680 muskrat skins which in December, 1926, were seized by defendants as game wardens of the state of Minnesota. Defendant Gould was at the time the acting commissioner of game and fish. A verdict was directed for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiffs are engaged in the fur business at Duluth as copartners under the name of Hudson Bay Fur Company. They have a branch office across the Saint Louis river in Superior, Wisconsin, which is operated under the name of Lake Superior Fur Company. The furs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. HaydelSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lacoste v. Department of Conservation of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. ShowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- The Maytag Co. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Poznanovic v. MakiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict SchmidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.