Legal Opinion
Bohman v. Gould
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 17, 1926No. 25,685PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to their complaint as not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
Chapter 195, p. 216, L. 1925, amending G. S. 1923, § 5598, became effective April 13, 1925. It authorized the taking of fish from certain lakes therein named, provided a license to do so should first be obtained from the commissioner, and “provided further no commercial fishing shall be authorized by the Commissioner in Kabetogama Lake after January 1st, 1926.”
For several years plaintiffs have been engaged in commercial fishing in this lake. In their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. RodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomson v. DanaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1931
- Lipinski v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Schmidt v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927