Legal Opinion
Turnbow v. Lamb
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1938No. 8472PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs below, Lamb; Olsen, and Keenan, together with W. C. Turnbow Petroleum Corporation, constituted a mining partnership in the operation of an oil and gas lease in Texas, each partner owning a constituent interest in the lease. Turnbow Corporation was the operating partner. The others contributed their pro rata part of the operating expense, and were entitled to their pro rata share of the profits.
A proper accounting was rendered by Turnbow Corporation for oil lawfully produced. Unknown to its copartners, however, and without their consent, Turn-bow Corporation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. AmmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Stewart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Marshall v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Witliff v. SpreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Futch v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Exxon Corp. v. Miesch, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Emerald Oil and Gas, L.C. Ex Rel. Saglio Partnership Ltd. v. Exxon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- Sun Oil Company v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. American Trading & Production Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.