In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ek
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In the fall of 1999, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility attempted to investigate a complaint filed by one of respondent’s clients. In an untimely reply, respondent acknowledged his failure to communicate with his client and attend to the case, however respondent failed to respond to subsequent requests for information. On May 8, 2000, respondent was mailed charges of unprofessional conduct and a notice of a pre-hearing meeting requiring his attendance at which respondent ultimately failed to appear. The Director subsequently petitioned for disciplinary…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009