Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Ek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 2002No. C3-00-2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In the fall of 1999, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility attempted to investigate a complaint filed by one of respondent’s clients. In an untimely reply, respondent acknowledged his failure to communicate with his client and attend to the case, however respondent failed to respond to subsequent requests for information. On May 8, 2000, respondent was mailed charges of unprofessional conduct and a notice of a pre-hearing meeting requiring his attendance at which respondent ultimately failed to appear. The Director subsequently petitioned for disciplinary…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MadsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against EngelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against MontezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API