Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Action Against O'Brien

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2012No. A10-1467PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional - Responsibility ("Director") filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Joseph D. O'Brien, Jr., alleging that O'Brien neglected two client matters, failed to keep his client reasonably informed about those matters, did not return his client's files, and failed to cooperate in the disciplinary investigation. O'Brien filed an answer to the Director's petition, but the referee struck O'Brien's answer as a sanction for his failure to timely comply with the referee's discovery order. The referee deemed admitted the…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against FairbairnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CrandallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against CuttingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Action Against VossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against TaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. In re Disciplinary Action Against JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against FruSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. In re Disciplinary Action Against AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API