Taylor v. Burdick
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.
Plaintiff instituted equity proceedings in _ circuit court to obtain a declaration of rights under the provisions of Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929 (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 27.501 et seq.]). The amended bill of complaint alleged that during his lifetime defendant’s decedent, Herman Faust, was the owner of a Dodge automobile, and that on the 23d of April, 1944, Mr. Faust executed an instrument in writing in the following form:
“4-23-44
Detroit, Michigan.
“I, Herman Faust, at these date, turn my car and my insurance property in Cleveland and some money to Mrs. Taylor.
Sgd.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Schomberg v. BaylyMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Reh v. ErtrachterMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Ittleson v. HaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Osius v. DingellMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Buell v. Orion State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Elizabeth A. Dodson and Edward L. Dodson v. Imperial Motors, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stewart R. DevriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.