Legal Opinion
Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1952No. Docket 98, Calendar 45,331PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.
Tbe material facts in tbis case are not in dispute. In June, 1950, tbe defendant W. C. Artz was engaged.in business at Munith, Michigan, in connection with which he purchased and sold used automobiles. He was the owner of a certain Ford car which the plaintiffs sought to purchase from him. The negotiations on behalf of Artz were conducted by his employee Clarence Sloan. An agreement was reached in accordance with which plaintiff Andrew W. Bayer paid the sum of $583 in cash and transferred to Artz the possession and title of a Ford station wagon at an agreed valuation of $500. Possession of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Fogle v. General Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Cole v. Cole Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Whitcraft v. WolfeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Messer v. AverillMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employees' Defined Benefit Pension Trust and William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C., and Counterclaim (88-1008) v. United States of America, and Counterclaim v. Rubenstein, Isaacs, Bordman & Lax Corporation, Counterclaim Lowell R. Stuckman, Intervenor-Appellant (88-2194)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Holtzlander v. BrownellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Security Insurance v. DanielsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.