Legal Opinion

Osius v. Dingell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1965No. Calendar 27, Docket 50,581PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment restoring 200 shares of Toledo Edison stock to plaintiff as sole owner. Previously, plaintiff had purchased the stock and registered it in her name and that of Louis F. Dingell and Helen J. Dingell “as. joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common.” Defendants Louis F. and Helen J. Dingell are the parents of David Dingell, a minor. Plaintiff is not related to either defendant by blood or by marriage.

At the time of trial in 1963, plaintiff, a widow since 1933, was around 90 years of age and resided in a home for the aged. After serving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Buell v. Orion State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rose v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Taylor v. BurdickMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Pierowich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Soltis v. First of America Bank-MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re Rudell EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Davidson v. BugbeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In re Casey EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Gold v. Marquette University (In Re Leonard)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API