Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1967No. Docket Nos. 822, 823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

In November, 1964, the C & O Railway announced to the public, by newspaper advertisements, that its passenger trains, 14 and 15, which ran daily except Sunday between Grand Rapids and Detroit, would be discontinued on January 3, 1965. At the time the discontinuance was announced, C & 0 operated three pairs of passenger trains between Detroit and Grand Rapids. The first pair were train 14, which left Grand Rapids *496at 7:30 a.m. and arrived at Detroit at 10:30 a.m., and train 15, which left Detroit at 5:20 p.m. and arrived at Grand Rapids at 8:25 p.m., both of which made regular stops at Plymouth…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Davis'estateMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Taylor v. BurdickMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Finn v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Kansas City & Memphis Railway Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. C. & OR CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. C. & OR CO. v. Pub. Serv. Comm.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mary v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API