Legal Opinion

Ittleson v. Hagan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 153, Calendar No. 33,937PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiffs’ claim is based upon an assignment to them of a contract entered into by the defendant Hagan to purchase a motor vehicle from F. J. Quinlan of Mt. Pleasant. It contained the following provision:

“It is agreed that the title to, ownership in, and right of possession of said chattel are vested in you and your assigns until said indebtedness and all other sums of money payable to you, whether evidenced by note, book account, or otherwise, also any judgments which you, your successors or assigns may obtain therefor, shall have been fully paid in money, at which time ownership shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Endres v. Mara-Rickenbacker Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Nelson v. ViergiverMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Taylor v. BurdickMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Elizabeth A. Dodson and Edward L. Dodson v. Imperial Motors, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Stewart R. DevriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  5. Scarborough v. Detroit Operating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API