Legal Opinion

Schomberg v. Bayly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 36,063PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

These two suits arising out of the same automobile accident were tried together in the circuit court. There were five parties defendant: Thomas Bayly; Hall-Dodds Company, a Michigan corporation; Of. R. F. Company, a Michigan corporation; Albert Bonstell and Harold Bonstell. Plaintiff in each case had verdict and judgment against the two last-named defendants; but early in the trial the circuit judge on motion of the other three defendants decided to direct a verdict in their favor, and later did so. Prom the directed verdict in each case plaintiff has appealed.

The directed verdicts were based…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. PointerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fleckenstein v. Citizens' Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DempsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Goins v. Greenfield Jeep Eagle, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Kimber v. EdingMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API