Legal Opinion

Altholtz v. Connecticut Dental Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. 2867PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiff is appealing from the dismissal of his administrative appeal from a decision by the defendant to suspend his license to practice dentistry.

The administrative proceeding against the plaintiff arose from a letter of complaint filed with the defendant by a senior dental claim examiner from Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (Connecticut General). In that letter, the claim examiner, Jerry D. Fix, advised the defendant that the plaintiff had billed his company for dental work that either had not been performed or had been performed unsatisfactorily. After meeting with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Cassella v. Civil Service CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Marshall v. DelPonteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Laufer v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API