Legal Opinion
Amsel v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1954PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The plaintiffs, who are partners doing business as the Amsel Dental Laboratory, brought an action in the Superior Court against the defendants, who comprise the dental commission of the state of Connecticut, asking for a judgment declaring unconstitutional “An Act concerning the Practice of Dentistry,” being No. 486 of the Public Acts of 1953. General Statutes, Cum. Sup. 1953, §§ 1696c, 1697c. By stipulation, the ease has been reserved for the advice of this court upon the questions set forth in the footnote.
The stipulated facts may be abbreviated as follows : The plaintiffs have been…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- People v. GroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.